Albert O. Hirschman explains that in the face of changing epoch scenarios conservative impulses arise that can be synthesized in three theses: perversity, futility and risk1. Risk and perversity imply a logic of fatality: change would lead to questioning achievements and aggravating problems. Futility supposes the banalization of change. If that were so, it Whatsapp Mobile Number List would suffice to forge strategies between immobility and resistance. But the dimensions of the change of time can also be read as coordinates for the reconstruction of citizenship. The current context of climate emergency and post-pandemic uncertainties is a scenario in which we can map the social, ecological and gender contracts for the 21st century : a network of rights connected to the society that emerged from the great transitions and its new structure of collective risks .
This is what we have tried to carry out with the Whatsapp Mobile Number List coordination of the work Lives in transition. (Re)construct social citizenship two, from which we have extracted an important part of the reflections of this article. In other works, the restructuring processes of classical social policies have been dealt with in depth. Now, although Whatsapp Mobile Number List exercise is different: it starts from the dynamics of the change of time and intends to delve into them to rebuild and rethink devices to make rights, security and care effective. In other words, forging new spaces for social citizenship strongly connected to emerging realities.
Thus, and to continue advancing in the humanist and emancipatory drive that gave rise to the Welfare States of the "Glorious Thirty"3, but situated in the 21st century , four propositive vectors emerge that are developed in the following sections: linking equality with differences; connect autonomy with bonds; democratize social citizenship; strengthen Whatsapp Mobile Number List proximity and multi-scalar citizenship. It seems evident that an abyss opens between this scenario and the Fordist-Keynesian logics that gave birth to the welfare regimes of the 20th century . It is a dislocation of the times that calls for exploring new types of policies and new ways of producing them, a present that invites us to place the Welfare State in front of the mirror of the change of era.